Just more runs added as compared to July 10th and the first signs of the up(otato)silon.
Fills
Luminosity estimated assuming a T0VX cross-section of 39 mb
| fill number | filling scheme | <mu> | lumi trigger | estimated ALICE lumi (nb^-1) | CMUL-B-NOPF-MUON lumi (nb^-1) | eff (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3962 | 50ns_50b_38_31_36_6bpi10inj_wp | 0.15 | C0TVX-B-NOPF-CENTNOTRD | 16.87 | 12.73 | 75 |
| 3965 | 50ns_152b_110_36_108_36bpi7inj_wp | 0.28 | C0TVX-B-NOPF-CENTNOTRD | 4.24 | 3.53 | 83 |
| 3971 | 50ns_152b_110_36_108_36bpi7inj | 0.29 | C0TVX-B-NOPF-CENTNOTRD | 2.51 | 2.05 | 82 |
| 3976 | 50ns_152b_110_36_108_36bpi7inj | 0.26 and 0.69 | C0TVX-B-NOPF-CENTNOTRD and C0TVX-B-NOPF-MUON | 17.4 and 28.3 | 36.5 | 80 |
| 3983 | 50ns_296b_254_36_246_36bpi11inj | 0.44 | C0TVX-B-NOPF-MUON | 2.33 | 2.13 | 91 |
| 3986 | 50ns_296b_254_36_246_36bpi11inj | 0.73 | C0TVX-B-NOPF-MUON | 2.10 | 1.81 | 86 |
| 3988 | 50ns_296b_254_36_246_36bpi11inj | 0.88 | C0TVX-B-NOPF-MUON | 51.0 | 42.4 | 83 |
| 3992 | 50ns_476b_414_32_397_72bpi10inj | 0.81 | C0TVX-B-NOPF-MUON | 44.7 | 37.0 | 83 |
| 3996 | 50ns_476b_414_32_397_72bpi10inj | 1.07 | C0TVX-B-NOPF-MUON | 44.6 | 38.0 | 85 |
| 4008 | 50ns_298b_256_38_246_36bpi13inj | 1.00 | C0TVX-B-NOPF-MUON | 18.0 | 13.5 | 75 |
| 4019 | 50ns_482b_420_32_397_72bpi11inj | 1.18 | C0TVX-B-NOPF-MUON | 7.1 | 3.0 | 42 |
| 4020 | 50ns_482b_420_32_397_72bpi11inj | 1.14 | C0TVX-B-NOPF-MUON | 3.6 | 2.5 | 68 |
Total CMUL7 lumi 195 nb^-1
Acc x Eff
Note that the weighted (by number of triggers) mean of Acc x Eff is around 0.16
Concerning the Acc x Eff, please note that there is no matching condition on any of the tracks themselves (just like on data for the moment), but I do require the CMULLO-B-NOPF-MUON to be present in the simulated AOD.
Minv
And, just for the fun, an invariant mass plot extended towards the up(otato)silon.
Note that the selection on event and pairs is a bit more strict (more like usual in fact) than before : I request physics selection and track matching to the trigger.